You may ask why it's necessary to test for rare diseases in parents. The answer is that many people carry one copy of the mutation for a specific disease in their DNA, but this does not affect them in any way because humans need two copies in order to develop the disease. So if two people trying to conceive each have one single copy, then their child would have a twenty-five percent chance of receiving those genes and ultimately developing the disease.
The way this device works is that a probe catches small, specific pieces of DNA from the parents and examines them with great accuracy. Counsyl is hoping to start using a new technology called gene sequencing technology. This will actually allow the device to read every single letter of the specific genes in the DNA for a disease which will create even greater accuracy.
The topic of genetic testing is controversial because some people believe whatever child they create is the child they were supposed to have. They think that by using genetic testing, it's almost like cheating; it's as if you're creating the "perfect child". But I believe these technologies are great as they can assure a newborn's health. It can cost thousands of millions of dollars to take care of a sick child or even worse have your child die at a young age. I think that if we can prevent sickness then we should definitely use every tool we have to do so.
I also think that it's important to get the news out that there are new technologies developing all the time which are more and more useful to everyday people. For example, years ago only a wealthy person could purchase a genetic test, but since the cost has dropped so much, it's available to more and more people. This will make our world a healthier place, and hopefully one day we'll be able to eliminate these terrible diseases all together.
I think that technology is amazing. I agree with you on your view of genetic testing. There are many philosophical arguments concerning the subject at hand. But if there is a way to help prevent pointless human suffering I am all for it. This technology could be the gate way to helping prevent other human diseases such as cancer and other life threatening diseases that are transmitted through birth and development. As long as the testing is not used to change the human's gene I believe there should be no problem in having disease free children.
ReplyDeleteI was wondering does this testing just test for the diseases and do nothing else or do the results of the test actually lead to some action. If the results of the test showed that a child had the possibility of getting the disease what would then be done by doctors to prevent the disease from being passed down? Is that option available to parents yet? The possibility of this is crazy. Soon, you'll be able to pick out your child like you pick out a pair of clothes.
ReplyDeleteI think testing is something thats pretty cool these days. I dont agree with creating an elite society and picking perfect children or making designer babies with invitro fertilization, but i do think it's ok to get a head start on sickness. Although it may be prenatal to the extreme, to me if no one is being harmed, it's really no different then taking airborne or loading yourself up on vitamin C to prevent being sick. If we can stop something from progressing and making our children extremely sick, why wouldnt we?
ReplyDelete